TL;DR
Get pool and patio gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Livingetc writer tested three DUSK sofa collections in person at a press preview: Brooklyn, Chicago and Hampshire. The report describes Brooklyn as the deepest and most relaxed, Chicago as more upright and contained, and Hampshire as the most traditional; the writer favored Brooklyn. The trial covered only three models, and the article does not provide prices or a full account of testing conditions.
Livingetc writer tested three DUSK sofas in person at a press preview, offering a rare chance to assess the online-only retailer’s upholstery and seating beyond product photos. The report compares the Brooklyn, Chicago and Hampshire collections, with the writer preferring Brooklyn for its deep seat and relaxed comfort; the assessment is based on trying those three models, not the full range.
The writer said the Brooklyn was the easiest of the three to settle into. Its broad arms, roomy seat and softer back cushions gave it a more lounging-focused feel, while its shape remained contemporary. DUSK lists the three-seater’s seat depth at 73 centimetres. The report says the range comes in several configurations and colors, and that its three-seater had a customer rating of 4.92 out of 5 from almost 900 reviews at the time of the article.
The Chicago felt sleeker and more contained, with slimmer arms and a tighter seat that encouraged a more upright posture. Its three-seater seat depth is listed by DUSK as 56 centimetres, 17 centimetres less than the Brooklyn’s. The writer described the separate rounded back cushions as a defining feature. The Chicago two-seater was listed with a 4.87 out of 5 rating from 120 reviews; customer ratings are a separate measure from the writer’s brief in-person test.
The Hampshire was the most traditional in appearance, with lower, softly shaped arms and a familiar cushion-backed outline. The reviewer said its style could suit a traditional interior or soften a modern room, and noted that DUSK offers it in varied fabrics and colors, including striped options. The report also highlighted other designs, including Manhattan, Porto, Bondi, Marseille, Miami, Malibu, Sicily, Hudson and Soho, but explicitly said the writer had not tested those models in person.
What an In-Person Sofa Trial Shows
For shoppers buying from an online-only retailer, a physical test can help answer questions that product imagery may not settle: how firm a seat feels, whether the back supports an upright posture, and how the fabric and color appear in person. Livingetc’s report offers a direct comparison of three distinct seating styles, giving readers a starting point for deciding which qualities to investigate before ordering.
The comparison also shows why a single recommendation may not suit every household. Brooklyn’s 73-centimetre seat depth may appeal to people who like to lounge or tuck their feet up, while Chicago’s shallower seat and firmer, more contained feel may suit shoppers who prefer a more upright position. Hampshire offers a different choice for those prioritizing a classic outline. These are the writer’s observations, not a standardized comfort test or a guarantee that every buyer will experience the sofas in the same way.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Three Models From a Wide Range
The Livingetc report begins from a practical limitation of buying furniture online: shoppers cannot normally sit on a sofa before placing an order. The writer said the press preview for DUSK’s upcoming collection provided an opportunity to try a small selection. The article describes the retailer’s sofa range as containing 400-plus options, but the hands-on assessment covered only three collections.
That distinction matters when weighing the review. The writer’s preferred model was Brooklyn, based on its comfort and deep seat, while the Chicago and Hampshire were assessed for their different shapes and seating feel. The additional styles named in the piece are suggestions that caught the writer’s eye, not reviewed recommendations. The article also points readers toward online customer reviews, though those ratings do not replace trying a sofa in person.
““The Brooklyn collection was the one I found easiest to settle into.””
— Livingetc writer
Limits of the Sofa Comparison
The report does not provide a test date, prices, exact fabric specifications for each tested sample, or details such as how long the writer sat on each sofa. It also does not describe a controlled test, so the impressions are subjective and may not reflect how the sofas feel to every shopper. The customer-rating figures are presented as reported in the article, but no capture date is supplied.
Only three models were tried in person. The writer did not test the other named DUSK designs, and the material does not establish whether the upcoming collection has since launched or whether product specifications and ratings remain unchanged. Readers should check DUSK’s current product listings for availability, configuration, fabric, delivery and pricing information.
Check Current Listings Before Buying
The report does not identify a further hands-on test or provide a follow-up schedule. For shoppers considering one of the sofas, the immediate next step is to compare current product details with their own room and seating needs: measure the available space, check seat depth and configuration, and review the latest fabric and color options. Where possible, buyers can seek out a showroom or another opportunity to test the furniture before ordering.
Readers interested in the untested sofa-bed designs can consult the separate DUSK sofa-bed research mentioned in the article. Any decision based on the review should account for its scope: three sofas tested, with the writer’s strongest preference for Brooklyn, and no in-person assessment of the other models.
Key Questions
Which DUSK sofa did the Livingetc writer prefer?
The writer preferred the Brooklyn, describing it as the easiest to settle into because of its deep seat, broad arms and relaxed feel.
What is the difference between the Brooklyn and Chicago seat depths?
DUSK lists the three-seater Brooklyn seat depth as 73 centimetres and the Chicago’s as 56 centimetres. The report says Brooklyn felt more suited to lounging, while Chicago encouraged a more upright position.
Did the writer test every sofa in DUSK’s range?
No. The in-person test covered Brooklyn, Chicago and Hampshire. The report names other DUSK models as honorable mentions but says the writer had not tried them in person.
Are the reported customer ratings a substitute for trying a sofa?
No. The article cites customer ratings for the Brooklyn three-seater and Chicago two-seater, but those figures are not a standardized comfort test. The writer’s own assessment was also subjective, so shoppers should check current reviews and product information.
Source: rss
Fall Picks
fall essentials
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
